Codex case library›Video and Sales
Back to all cases

Bilibili Product Video AI Automatic Editing: From 20 Hours to 30-Minute Final Review

35w+Average monthly sales GMV
20 hoursEditing time for a single video
30 minutesFinal review time after AI editing
01

What this case covers

The author, Baizhou, is a coach in the Bilibili product recommendation Shenhai community and operates matrix sales accounts around digital, home appliance, and home furnishing tracks. The article covers the principles of using Codex to build an automatic editing workflow, three technical routes, and two practical workflows.

02

Questions it answers

  1. What is the difference between Codex editing and Jianying image-to-video?
  2. How should Agents, Skills, and the material library divide responsibilities?
  3. What scenarios is the reverse deconstruction workflow suitable for?
  4. From which step does the forward creation workflow start?
  5. How should HyperFrames and Remotion be chosen?
03

Our observations

  1. The essence of editing bottlenecks is that the SOP has not been made explicit, not that the tools are not strong enough.
  2. A chaotic material library directly lowers final video quality, unrelated to model capability.
  3. The more refined the editing effect, the higher the token and time cost of polishing the Skill.
04

From the author

Codex = you turn your own editing SOP into a digital editor that can be reused infinitely
QR code for a three-day trial of Shengcaiyoushu

The complete post is available in the Shengcaiyoushu community

Scan for a free three-day trial and read the complete original. Platform rules apply.