Codex case library›Workflows and Agents
Back to all cases

An AI Development Team's Half-Year Practice of Using Codex and an Account Pool to Manage Tokens

2Number of GPT Pro accounts
20-30% of original priceGPT plan discount
60-80% of original priceRelay station discount
01

What this case covers

The author has a development background and shifted from individual OPC to leading a team of more than ten AI developers. Within half a year, they experienced OpenClaw shutdown, muddled Token accounts, account bans, and permission incidents. The article covers tool selection, account pool solutions, security experiments, and onboarding experience for newcomers.

02

Questions it answers

  1. Why did the OpenClaw multi-Agent solution shut down after one month?
  2. How did the New-API relay station solve the Token allocation problem?
  3. What pitfalls were encountered in selecting Cursor, Claude, and Codex?
  4. What risks did the relay station security experiment expose?
  5. How should veterans run MVPs and newcomers take over maintenance?
03

Our observations

  1. All-purpose Agents cannot beat specialized development tools in real engineering delivery.
  2. Only after Token management is observable can optimization and reimbursement be discussed.
  3. AI suggestions are only locally optimal; preventing global collapse depends on permission isolation as a fallback.
04

From the author

First make behavior observable, then talk about optimization - this principle holds for managing Tokens, and it holds for managing other things too.
QR code for a three-day trial of Shengcaiyoushu

The complete post is available in the Shengcaiyoushu community

Scan for a free three-day trial and read the complete original. Platform rules apply.