Codex case library›Video & E-commerce
Back to all cases

From Talking-Head to Finished Video: Referencing ChatCut to Get an AI Editing Workflow Working with Codex

From talking-head video to finished filmComplete editing pipeline
ModularFailed steps can be rerun separately
Codex executionRepeated editing actions
01

What this case covers

An editing outsider referenced the ChatCut architecture, used Claude and Codex to build a production line from talking-head transcription, A-roll cutting, and storyboarding to animation, and tested the results with real publishing data.

02

Questions it answers

  1. How is the entire AI editing production line composed?
  2. Why not do storyboarding before the script is finalized?
  3. Which materials are not suitable for AI generation?
  4. How does Feishu review reduce communication costs?
  5. What does high views but low completion rate indicate?
03

Our observations

  1. Workflow results must be tested with publishing data, not just by whether the finished video looks polished.
  2. After the opening gains exposure, a low completion rate means the middle section and video length still need optimization.
  3. AI handles the manual labor, while humans handle judgments that affect the authenticity of expression.
04

From the author

It is not an editing software; it is a working process of 'humans only make judgments, AI does the manual labor.'
QR code for a three-day trial of Shengcaiyoushu

The complete post is available in the Shengcaiyoushu community

Scan for a free three-day trial and read the complete original. Platform rules apply.