Codex case library›Product Development
Back to all cases

Sweet Potato Radar Product Selection Monitoring: Using AI to Turn Sales Changes of Xiaohongshu Virtual Materials into Product Selection Evidence

1 hourInterval for collecting public product information
More than 1,000Products in the author's product selection library
3–7 daysThe author's usual observation period
01

What this case covers

Dongqing turned Xiaohongshu virtual materials product selection experience into Sweet Potato Radar, continuously recording product sales and connecting to MCP for AI analysis. The article combines a real product selection library to discuss sales changes, abnormal data, and human judgment, and also provides development requirements that can be handed to Codex.

02

Questions it answers

  1. Why is cumulative sales insufficient to judge an opportunity?
  2. How can you tell whether a product is starting to scale?
  3. How does collection failure interfere with sales judgment?
  4. How should candidate products be ranked for observation?
  5. Beyond the tool score, what else still needs to be judged?
03

Our observations

  1. If data collection anomalies are treated as zero sales, they will create false growth signals.
  2. The ranking is suitable for arranging observation order; whether it can be delivered still requires the operator's judgment.
04

From the author

I built Sweet Potato Radar not to let a score place bets for me, but to turn what was originally vague experience into data that can be checked.
QR code for a three-day trial of Shengcaiyoushu

The complete post is available in the Shengcaiyoushu community

Scan for a free three-day trial and read the complete original. Platform rules apply.